When a provider leaves
When a game provider leaves: what a studio list can and cannot tell you
We compare 32 provider lists read on 26 August 2026, from 150 names at Instant Casino to 12 at Lucky Block. A list answers one question well: whether a studio you follow is there.
Players who follow a particular slot studio, or who come to Duelbits for its in-house Originals, run into the same question at every alternative: is the thing I play actually there? Below we compare 32 provider lists from the 100 operators whose pages we checked on 26 August 2026. Duelbits' own casino is covered on Duelbits casino and its in-house games on Duelbits Originals.
A studio leaving and a section closing are different problems
Games disappear from a lobby in two quite different ways, and they need separating before anything can be compared.
A single studio disappears. The games were there and now they are gone. That is a catalogue question, and a published provider list answers it directly: the operator either prints the studio's name or it does not.
A whole section disappears. A sportsbook, a live-dealer floor, a rakeback scheme, a poker room. That is a product question, and a list of studio names cannot settle it. Where we have no document on a product question, we mark it unverified rather than guess.
Thirty-two catalogues, and what the number means
Source: operators' own pages, read 26 August 2026. The number is how many names the operator printed, not a count of separate studios.
| Operator | Names printed | Operator | Names printed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Instant Casino | 150 | Roobet | 64 |
| Betriot | 140 | CoinCasino | 63 |
| Bitcasino.io | 120 | BitStarz | 62 |
| Fairspin | 114 | Livecasino.io | 50 |
| Sportsbet.io | 110 | Thrill | 47 |
| TG.Casino | 94 | Betcoin.ag | 47 |
| Flush | 85 | Windice | 44 |
| Wild.io | 80 | TrustDice | 43 |
| Empire.io | 79 | LTC Casino | 42 |
| Playbet.io | 79 | FortuneJack | 42 |
| BetFury | 73 | Bitsler | 41 |
| Chips.gg | 40 | Crashino | 36 |
| Thunderpick | 40 | Sol Casino | 32 |
| Rainbet | 33 | DuckDice | 19 |
| Wolf.bet | 32 | CryptoLeo | 13 |
| BetPlays | 19 | Lucky Block | 12 |
Why a name count is not a studio count
Two names that differ by a space or a suffix are still two names. A catalogue that prints one studio under two spellings, or lists a studio's live arm separately from its slots arm, produces a bigger number without a bigger lobby. That is why the column reads names printed, and why we give no studio count anywhere: we have not matched these lists against a register of companies, and an unchecked number should not look like a checked one.
Most of the 100 operators are missing from the table because we did not read them on this point. Rocketpot shows why a count can be hard to get even when you look. It prints no provider total anywhere on its site, its provider index loads tiles only as you scroll, and its promotions copy names thirty-one studios in prose without giving a total. The honest record there is no number.
What a catalogue settles
Used narrowly, a provider list is a good tool.
If the studio has a name, the list gives a yes or a no. That covers the most common version of this problem. A player whose favourite studio vanished from one lobby can check 32 catalogues in a few minutes and see which ones print that name.
Length is not quality. A catalogue of 150 names and one of 40 differ in breadth. Neither tells you whether the particular games you play are inside it.
A catalogue is a snapshot. Every figure above was read on one day, 26 August 2026, and lobbies change without notice. That is why the date travels with the number.
A front page is a snapshot too, and a thinner one. Duelbits' public front page, as we captured it on 26 August 2026, showed a Casino tile and a Sports tile, with sidebar entries including Leaderboards, Challenges and Tap Trading marked NEW; the game rows had not loaded. A page like that tells you which sections exist. It does not tell you which studios stand behind them.
In-house games sit outside every studio list
A provider list names outside studios. Games a casino builds for itself, such as crash, dice, mines or plinko, will not appear in it, so a list alone cannot tell you whether an alternative has its own versions.
The lobby answers that. Shuffle's front page, for example, shows an in-house row of Dice, Mines, Keno, Limbo, Plinko and Blackjack.
Stake's front page puts the casino and the sportsbook side by side, with live counters on each.
Cloudbet's casino lobby is another place to look before you move a balance.
If Duelbits' Originals are what you would miss, compare in-house rows, and treat any house edge the operator prints as the cost of play rather than something a method can beat.
What no catalogue settles
Four questions come up again and again, and a provider list answers none of them.
- Whether a specific game is switched on for your account. Studios license titles by market and operators enable them by market, and a list of names shows neither step. Where Duelbits itself is available is covered on where Duelbits is available.
- Whether a section will stay. A sportsbook or a live floor can be switched off between one visit and the next, and none of the documents we read commits to keeping one.
- Why something left. A licensing lapse, a commercial decision and a compliance decision look the same from the lobby.
- Whether the replacement is the same game. Two studios can publish titles with similar mechanics that play differently.
For all four, the honest record is unverified.
Using this when you switch
Start with the name. If a studio you follow is in one of the 32 lists above, that operator at least printed it on 26 August 2026. Then check the lobby for in-house games, and the product for the sections you use: sportsbook, live casino, rewards. The operators themselves, with those products compared, are on our Duelbits alternatives page.