An honest list
Everything we have not done, listed plainly
We have put our own money through two casinos, Vave on 28 August 2026 and TrustDice in May 2026, and Duelbits is not one of them. Here is the rest of what we have not done: payouts we never timed, lobbies we never browsed and cashier limits we never saw.
Two casinos have had our own money through them: Vave on 28 August 2026 and TrustDice in May 2026. Everything else we write about, Duelbits included, comes from documents: terms, help centres and licence registers. Here is what that leaves untested, so you can see the shape of our evidence before you rely on any of it.
Duelbits was not tested with money
Nobody on our team has opened an account at Duelbits. We have not logged in, played, deposited or withdrawn there, and we have never seen a Duelbits cashier. So there are no Duelbits payout screenshots on our pages.
What we did capture is Duelbits' public front page, on 26 August 2026: the page anyone sees before signing in. Everything deeper, from its terms and help centre to its rewards, Originals and promotions pages, comes from Duelbits' own pages as archived by the Wayback Machine. Every such fact carries its archive date and is written as “Duelbits' help centre, as archived on” that date. An archive copy can be older than the live page, so check the date beside any figure you plan to rely on.
The Duelbits questions those documents leave open are listed on what we could not verify.
What our two tests cover, and what they do not
Vave, 28 August 2026. We deposited, played and withdrew. No ID was requested up to 5,000 USDT. We did not record how long the withdrawal took, so we give no payout time for Vave. Vave is our advertiser, the only paid placement on the site.
TrustDice, May 2026. We deposited USDT and played for several weeks. Crypto withdrawals arrived in 10 to 15 minutes each, and no ID was requested until withdrawals reached about 5,000 USDT in total. The next one went to payment under review, then a Veriff check: our driving licence was rejected and our passport passed on the fifth attempt. TrustDice then asked for the documents again by email.
Each test is one account over one period. Neither tells you how a different account will be treated, and neither says anything about Duelbits. How we keep a test result apart from a printed clause is on how we treat payout claims.
No payout timed anywhere else
Every processing window on our pages, apart from the TrustDice test, is a promise quoted from a clause. Rocketpot's 72 hours at clause 11.3 and Jackbit's one day at clause 12 are things those casinos wrote down; nobody on our team has stood a stopwatch beside either.
That difference matters when you compare. A printed window is something you can hold a casino to. It is not proof of how fast the queue actually moves. The printed windows are set side by side on withdrawal times compared.
No game lobby browsed
We have not logged in to any of the casinos we compare to look through their game lists. That has three consequences you will notice on our pages:
- No game counts. Two casinos can count the same lobby differently, and we have verified neither count.
- Provider figures are names the casino printed, not a verified count of studios.
- Product descriptions come from the casino's own pages. Whether a brand runs a sportsbook, live dealers or its own in-house games is easy to see in a lobby and often absent from the terms. We say which page each description comes from.
The same goes for Duelbits. Its Originals, sportsbook and rewards are described from its own pages as archived, never from inside an account.
No cashier screen opened, beyond our two tests
Several casinos keep their real limits behind the login. Shuffle's clause 10.6 says the minimum withdrawal for each method is shown in the cashier when you make the request. Bitcasino.io's clause 6.2 points to its help centre for minimum amounts. Jackbit says its minimum and maximum depend on the payment method and publishes neither.
For all three, our record is empty, because the screen that shows the figure is inside an account we did not open. That is a different statement from “this casino has no minimum,” and we keep the two apart.
No numbers from review sites
We take no figures from review sites or rating aggregators, for any casino, and we do not reprint their game counts, user numbers, payout times or revenue figures for Duelbits.
The reason is practical. We once held a weekly withdrawal ceiling of $25,000 for Jackbit, taken from a third-party review. Jackbit's own clause 12 says $10,000 per seven days and $20,000 per thirty days. The review described a rule that is not in the document. We corrected it, logged the correction with its date, and stopped using such sources altogether.
No overall score
We do not rate casinos out of ten. A single score would blend answers we read in a casino's terms with answers we never found, and there is no fair way to weigh one against the other. Instead we show each answer with its clause and date, and write “not given in the documents we read” where that is the case.
Why we publish this list
A site that lists only what it did leaves you to assume it did everything. Reading this list first tells you how to weigh the rest: a quoted clause is a promise, one of our two tests is one account's experience, and a gap is a gap. With that in mind, our comparison of Duelbits alternatives is easier to use for your own decision.